According to current theory, throw here helping industrial development in some poor country. That is why we are good, because we are consumers. However, such furniture, even the cheapest, have consumed trees, burned fuel in its long journey from China or Malaysia. The logic of throw away it after use, which is more reasonable for a plastic syringe, it becomes a law needed to stimulate the economy and maintain GDP in perpetual growth, with their respective crises and phobias when his fall causes a recession of two percent. To leave it there to increase the drug. Only United States, for example, allocates billions of dollars so their inhabitants to return to consume, spend, to get out of the madness of the recession and so the world can continue to rotate, consuming and discarding. But such wastes, by cheap than consumerism is based on inexpensive, disposable goods that makes almost inaccessible durables recycling possess pieces of wood, plastic, batteries, iron, screws, glass and most plastic pipes. In United States all that and something more going in the trash even in this so-called time of great crisis for dubious reasons and in poor countries, the poor go in search of that crap.

In the long run, who ends up consuming all the garbage is the nature while humanity keeps putting on hold their changes of habits out of the recession first and to sustain the growth of the economy then. But what mean growth of the economy, that two or three per cent who are obsessed with the whole world, from North to South and from East to West? The world is convinced that is in a terrible crisis. But the world was always in crisis. It is now defined as a global crisis because (1) proceeds and affects the economy of the richest; (2) the simplified development paradigm has irradiated his hysteria to the rest of the world, subtracting him legitimacy.