September 30th, 2013

By its relative isolation, you had best chances of preserving its unique nature without pollution, its originality and can therefore taking revolutionary novel and sometimes headings. Many of the geniuses of the sciences and the arts, for example, people were very retracted. The shyness gives a very original vision of things. But here the advantages of shy persons are not finished. The discretion and reliability are other qualities that characterize them. They are little communicative and perhaps why are reserved and good to keep secrets. Not feel any urgency to tell what they know. The shy tend to save things for themselves and therefore are not good to disseminate news.

Discretion and the ability to keep secrets are rare qualities. The shy have them. They are also people who tend to the seriousness, are stable with their interests and their friends. They are able to work without needing external stimuli to do so. They emit their own light as I could say. Many of them complain about their lack of courage, but being bold is not always good. The audacity becomes only necessary on rare occasions, the rest of them, is paid with the failure. Prudence is therefore also a virtue of which shy people do not lack.

They think good things before carrying them out. And so they have fewer opportunities to make mistakes. That It is one of the reasons that sometimes succeed where others fail. Many shy, as they speak little, give the impression of being intelligent people. And they are often clear. They are imaginative and very observant. It is not uncommon to find among them artistic trends and scientific acuity. But they are also very critical. That is why you can find mistakes that go unnoticed for the rest of the people. Another of its special capabilities is the ability to spend much time alone without being disturbed. That is why they are very valuable to perform tasks requiring little dealings with people and an isolation that extroverted people not retrofitted without falling into a crisis of anxiety. Shyness has advantages even for couple relationships. By unexpected as it may seem that statement, note that there are people who feel fascinated by the shy. And they come to feel a strong attraction to the intriguing humility of introverted people. The shy have a very special way to demonstrate your affection. And once you commit to someone, they tend to be very deep and stable. Several conclusions can be drawn from all this. But one of them is that shyness should not be denied of itself. Actions should aim to overcome the deficiencies that imposes. Provided that at the same time maintain and stimulate some of his virtues.


September 24th, 2013

Have you checked the meaning of your construct, not receiving validation on your assumption that not nice people can not physically be dear, and their experience has strengthened and has validated the new construct. The meanings are reviewed especially when they do not receive validation, and are strengthened and maintained when they are confirmed or validated in the experience. Shrek, happens something like Fiona, because it also part of the base that can not be loved by its appearance, ugly and horrible ogre, but appears when her love for Fiona appears emotions – the need for change. Not correctly interprets words that she hears from Fiona and flees, but later rethinks the situation on the basis of a conversation with donkey and returns to find his beloved. At first, you can see how it works as it is always used, i.e., to isolate themselves from the world, which can be interpreted as a resistance to change and a way of self-protection. However, and based on the message that conveys donkey, which means a new experience for him – be refused as he thought by Fiona – not reviewed their constructs once invalidated by the experience, producing the change. Any change is the reconstruction of a meaning, both if the change takes place at the behavioral level, cognitive or emotional. Lord Farquaad, in my opinion, do not feel at any time the need for change, so it is not produced in him no resignification, insisting on its current construction which leads him to be devoured by it symbolically, and in the film by the Dragon.

Therefore, in my view, this perspective would explain the functioning of the character but on the opposite side. Donkey, we could say that its role is more than an own reconstruction, therapist with Shrek and Fiona. In both there is a resistance to change because they prefer not to discard their nuclear buildings which are part of its identity and that acts as a protection for them. Donkey will help them in the process. This role can be seen in various scenes, when donkey discovers that Fiona It is Bewitched: you look like a little to an ogre, and Shrek, have many things in common you why not will say it to Shrek? tell the truth to Shrek (Donkey) do Shrek? (Fiona).

Here Fiona begins to realize that perhaps his mental construction is not adequate. It is not clear, but something is starting to change. With respect to Shrek, also begins to rethink its construction after a conversation with donkey and in the next scene:…shut up and listen…If really you try so bad why have you returned? you’re equal again than with Fiona and she only did quererte (Donkey) and after discussion of disqualifications many, Shrek just to apologize to your friend and ask him intrigued and interested…Hey hummmm, what was that Fiona told you of my (Shrek).? Donkey, therefore, takes with them a therapeutic position as occurs in this type of therapies, from expert to expert, in which Shrek and Fiona are possessors of their own meanings and donkey, although it is not this kind of tools specialist symbolically would act as such and helps them in self-examination. As they pointed Neimeyer and Fexias (1997), they jointly enter search characterized by collaboration and respect in pursuit of a revision of the system of personal meanings. Vertices psychologists Cabinet of Madrid: C / Caleruega, 88 Cabinet of Las Rozas de Madrid: Ave.


United States

September 18th, 2013

According to current theory, throw here helping industrial development in some poor country. That is why we are good, because we are consumers. However, such furniture, even the cheapest, have consumed trees, burned fuel in its long journey from China or Malaysia. The logic of throw away it after use, which is more reasonable for a plastic syringe, it becomes a law needed to stimulate the economy and maintain GDP in perpetual growth, with their respective crises and phobias when his fall causes a recession of two percent. To leave it there to increase the drug. Only United States, for example, allocates billions of dollars so their inhabitants to return to consume, spend, to get out of the madness of the recession and so the world can continue to rotate, consuming and discarding. But such wastes, by cheap than consumerism is based on inexpensive, disposable goods that makes almost inaccessible durables recycling possess pieces of wood, plastic, batteries, iron, screws, glass and most plastic pipes. In United States all that and something more going in the trash even in this so-called time of great crisis for dubious reasons and in poor countries, the poor go in search of that crap.

In the long run, who ends up consuming all the garbage is the nature while humanity keeps putting on hold their changes of habits out of the recession first and to sustain the growth of the economy then. But what mean growth of the economy, that two or three per cent who are obsessed with the whole world, from North to South and from East to West? The world is convinced that is in a terrible crisis. But the world was always in crisis. It is now defined as a global crisis because (1) proceeds and affects the economy of the richest; (2) the simplified development paradigm has irradiated his hysteria to the rest of the world, subtracting him legitimacy.

Tags: ,

Argentina Competitiveness

September 11th, 2013

Manufacturers in Argentina are concerned by the fall of the competitiveness of the real exchange rate, and it is not for less. With a quasi fixed dollar, at $3.10 and with a real inflation exceeding 20% inter-annual type of real change in argentina’s economy comes deteriorating at a strong pace. Such is the deterioration of the kind of real change that, as it reflects a Sebastian Campanario article to the site Ieco, the relationship between the value of the Argentine peso and the dollar would be one for 2009 in real terms. Until a few weeks ago ago, from the field not had heard many complaints in this respect. It is that with the high international prices of agricultural commodities, the field could keep their profitability despite withholding imposed by the national Government. But with the sharp fall in the international price of the price of agricultural commodities, next to retentions and the rising value of agricultural inputs (which is compounded by the severe drought that suffers in several regions of the) country), the current situation is totally different and this is why that was already ahead of the field will claim to agricultural Secretary Carlos Cheppi, a dollar from $3.50 to $3.80, which would imply an average jump close to 20% of its current value which is currently in the $3.12. The claim of the field isn’t very far away from that industrialists formulated (although more timidly). Thus, two sectors of weight in the Argentine economy, come together virtually on the order of a more competitive exchange rate. Probably since the Government noted how the external accounts are deteriorating without pause and perhaps up to recognize the need to do something to improve the competitiveness of the Argentine economy, but will the Government to devalue the Argentine peso in the search by restoring part of the lost competitiveness of the export sector ready? In his time, when the crisis erupted nominal exchange rate went from relationship one with the dollar at a ratio of $3.5 per dollar (and he even came to be hovering around $4 per dollar).

Tags: ,

David Bohm

September 5th, 2013

The purpose of the dialogue is not to try to win but to win all, if is done correctly. In dialogue, understanding and learning that you cannot individually generate can be obtained. Two people or a group generated a greater reserve of capable of development and constant change common meaning in dialogue. It is a key communication goal and learning teamwork. A group can explore complex issues from several points of view. Participants put their assumptions in abeyance although communicate them freely. Your result is a free scan that allows you to bring out the full depth of experience and personal thought transcending these individual perspectives. The dialog allows to reveal the incoherence of our thinking.

Important quantum physicist, David Bohm, developed a theory and methodology of dialogue in which the group opens to a wider intelligence flow. You should not surprise us that a quantum physicist is the agent of the emerging discipline of learning in computer. Another physicist Heisenberg, had declared: the science is rooted in conversations. The cooperation of different people may culminate in scientific results of the utmost importance. Sentence with started it this article.

Also Einstein, Bohr and other figures that crashing down and remodeled traditional physics during the past century, have reflected and made great contributions on the same line. Bhom model reveals that the incoherence of thought manifests itself in several ways:-the thinking denies that is participatory. Stop trace the reality and establishes its own reference plan to solve problems, problems that it helped create. What is a bias? When a person accepts a stereotype about a particular group, that thought is transformed into an active agent in the manner in which the person acts with another that belongs to that stereotypical class. Do not understand that that bias models which sees and his way of doing things. If you already understand it there would be no prejudice.

Tags: ,


© 1999-2017 My Phone Net All Rights Reserved