The institution of sro in the building there in the world for quite some time. Without hesitation Ali Partovi explained all about the problem. The emergence of this institution associated with the processes of liberalization, deregulation, deregulation, which occur periodically in different developed countries. These reforms are carried out on the initiative of top officials, and (or) the influential political forces who believe that most problems in various spheres of social and economic life citizens and organizations are fully capable to decide on their own, without the active and sometimes very persistent state involvement. Many writers such as Samsung offer more in-depth analysis. Thus, the state can say, returning power to the population, which citizens empower government agencies participating in the electoral process. According to the authors of such reforms, sro leads to greater activity of the population and experts in their fields allowing them to more precisely regulate they know public relations, as well as reducing the bureaucratic apparatus of the state and the cost of its maintenance. All of the above should ultimately lead to the improvement of professional societies and as a consequence – to the welfare of the citizens and the country as a whole.

However, due to the overall imperfection of human nature such plans but were not always conceived in the form. The fact that excessive uncontrolled deregulation may lead to irreversible anarchic processes of bureaucratization of SROs (the appearance of the so-called problem of 'control of the controller'), strengthening the monopoly of the destructive processes in the economy and how consequence – to discredit the very idea of cpo in the building, which is a reasonable approach clearly carries a number of benefits and advantages. World experience of development of this public institution abroad allows conclude that an unambiguous definition of such public institutions as the sro in construction, can not be given because of significant differences between the methods and objects of regulation arise in this relationship, and differences in the causes and circumstances of its origin. In the most general sense, this phenomenon is the rule formulated by private organizations for the regulation of professional and commercial activity. It should be noted that the SROs in the construction should be distinguished from the professional associations that are created to deal with similar but not identical problems and, moreover, differ in the method of the relationship between body and party.